Bumped By Rqst: BSG Webisode: Face of the Enemy: Webisode 9 – the missing Number Nine is online -frak yeah!

Bumped By Request:

Okay, after seeing webisode 9, I no longer think Gaeta is one of the FF, I think Gaeta is going to meet with Zarek (Zarek being the ‘him’ that Hoshi refers to at the end of Webisode 10, when he says ‘of all people, why are you meeting with him?” either it was Zarek or Baltar right?)

bsg_gaeta

So, reviewing that audio clue on You Will Know the Truth, and Webisode 9, I think Gaeta and Zarek plot to take over or do a terrorist style hostage taking or attack to end the Human-Cylon alliance. Gaeta post Number 8 and the reality of what Truly happened on New Caprica, feels the Cylons cannot be trusted,  Zarek wants no part of the alliance either. Baltar is in the audio clue, and Hoshi in that clip says to Adama, they are communicating with Colonial One sir. So that is the President’s ship yes and Baltar clearly isn’t on it ad is trying to talk Gaeta down…

Laura is going to go ballistic at some point based on teasers and Adama is ready to be airlocked..is that why?! Does Kara find something that shows she ‘died’ ? Is Tigh the Poseidon of the old gods, cause I think he would fit that role nicely..Why not go back to Kobol and start over there, prepare to deal with the splinter Cylon faction and move forward with the ‘shape of things to come’..the new hybrid generation…

Can’t wait!

Original Post: oh yeah here we go!

courtesy of nahiyyeaa

Oh you MUST WATCH THIS ONE, a reveal of the Gaeta/Baltar conversation during the Baltar Trial and of what really went down with Gaeta and the lists on New Caprica…..

Webisode 10 here

Webisode 8 here

Advertisements

January 11, 2009. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Battlestar Galactica, BSG, Caprica, Entertainment, Fantasy, Popular Culture, Sci Fi. Comments off.

Go Back Jack, Do it Again…Another 350B…PEBO asks for TARP Tranche Two

(courtesy of Melegorm)

Finally the frakin letter itself!

To be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR HERE, LOL, this is Team PEBO, which is largely comprised of UofC (Fuhrman, Goolsbee both in the meeting with DEM Senate leadership yesterday-the bill in question is coming from the House) and moderate Capitalists (Summers et al) , certainly not economic lefties, snark..

anywho, this is an attempt to head off the legislation Barney Frank has a hearing scheduled on tomorrow. The LETTER is a loose framework of nice words and means nada, I hope Barney passes this legislation before he hands over ANOTHER 350B of the taxpayer dollars with nary a string and a handshake and a letter. He should have learned from the first tranche.

Different players, same story. They are not really that different are they? It is Geithner incoming Treasury Secretary who ran the AIG and CITI bailouts after all….

PASS THAT LEGISLATION BARNEY! Don’t give them the dough without protecting taxpayers this time!!

Update 5: The letter via WGNtv :

President-elect Barack Obama’s top economic adviser tells Congress that the need for the remaining $350 billion of the financial bailout package is “imminent and urgent.”

Larry Summers has written a letter to the bipartisan leadership of the House of Representatives and the Senate to assure lawmakers that the money will be used to help community banks, small businesses, consumers and homeowners as well as large financial institutions.

And more interesting background from KTTC Rochester (via Politico):

Emerging from a two-hour meeting in the Capitol with Obama advisers Lawrence Summers and Jason Furman, Senate Democrats praised the President-elect’s team for agreeing to make changes to its stimulus proposal based off of concerns senators raised last week at a meeting with the president-elect’s senior aides.

The Obama team told about 35 Senate Democrats gathered at Sunday’s meeting that it would grow the size of an energy-tax incentive package and modify proposed tax credits for individuals and for businesses that hire new employees, according to meeting attendees. Also, with lawmakers raising concerns that the first half of the $700 billion of the financial rescue law was badly mismanaged, Obama’s team signaled it would lay out precisely how it would spend the second half of that package, which Congress is expected to consider as soon as this week.

“It’s very clear they’ve listened, they’ve heard and that they’re moving to respond,” said Sen. Kent Conrad, chairman of the Budget Committee, who questioned previously whether the tax credits in the stimulus package were enough to encourage new jobs. “It was very, very healthy. They’re not defensive, not arguing back, they’re listening, they’re attempting to hear and they’re responding.”

Update 4: 12:48pm EST: Update on the ‘letter of understanding’ via FoxBusiness:

The letter includes provisions that would loosely commit the Obama administration to use TARP funds to help troubled homeowners avoid foreclosure; to adopt tougher executive compensation limits and corporate governance standards for firms that participate in TARP, and increase reporting, oversight and disclosure requirements in the program.

The letter would allow the president-elect and Congressional Democrats to avoid a potentially embarrassing veto fight in Mr. Obama’s first weeks in office. The Treasury has spent or committed all of the $350 billion funding in the first half of the $700 billion TARP. To get authorization for the last $350 billion, the president — Bush now, or Obama after he takes office — must submit a report to Congress outlining how the Treasury would spend the money. The funding will be authorized automatically unless Congress votes to approve a “resolution of disapproval” within 15 days of receiving the report.

But the president could veto the resolution. Then to stop the funding, Congress — controlled by the president-elect’s own party — would have to override the veto with a two-thirds vote in the House and Senate.

While sources believe the next $350 billion will come regardless of how the process unfolds, a veto and effort to override it “would set up quite a mess the first weeks in office” for Mr. Obama, a financial industry source said. “That would be a disaster politically.”

Update 3: Larry Summers sending a ‘letter’ FOX reporting -vaguely – that letter indicates they (PEBO Team?) want to get more funds to Main St…

For a GREAT piece on how liberals are viewing the recent PEBO Team activity, read Jimmy Pethokoukis’ column here:

…But it’s Obama’s $800 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan that will be ground zero in this coming liberal internecine battle. “Way too much Reagan, not nearly enough FDR,” griped some key liberals about a plan that would, in addition to the tax cuts, still provide a whopping half-trillion dollars over two years in government spending for infrastructure, healthcare, education, clean energy, grants to states, and aid to lower-income and unemployed folks.

Some of their greatest hysterical hits: 1) “The economic plan he’s offering isn’t as strong as his language about the economic threat,” wrote NY Times columnist Paul Krugman. “In fact, it falls well short of what’s needed”; 2) the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank founded by Obama transition co-chair John Podesta, said the Obama plan was chock-full of “special interest favorites” and “long-discredited conservative proposals”; 3) Sen. Tom Harkin said Obamanomics “still looks a little more to me like trickle-down,” invoking a Reagan-era economic invective that liberals love to hurl; and 4) Nancy Pelosi, who seems to actually believe the Obama campaign spin that the Bush tax cuts somehow caused the recession, blurted out this gem: “Put me down as clearly as you possibly can as one who wants to have those tax cuts for the wealthiest in America repealed.” Duly noted, Madam Speaker.

(more…)

January 11, 2009. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Economy, Finance, Foreclosures, Housing, Obama Administration, Politics, TARP, Wall St. 1 comment.

%d bloggers like this: