Investors ‘walk away’ from $5.4 B Stuyvesant Town purchase, leave taxpayers on the hook (FAN FRED CALPERS)

A First Avenue view in New York of Peter Cooper Village, foreground, and Stuyvesant Town apartment complexes in October. Photo: Brian Harkin WSJ

Yep. Don’t want those pesky regular working class Americans to ‘walk away, jingle mail’ on their underwater homes, but it is fine for Tishman Speyer Properties and BlackRock Realty to walk away leaving taxpayers on the hook. Because this kind of decision is made every day in business, Americans are waking up to the fact that they are the only people attempting to stay while underwater when their contracts allow them to walk away as these investors are doing.

Just like many underwater homeowners, these investors had almost no skin in the game, all free money, our money, FAN FRED and public pension funds who invested with them will be on the hook and you know what that means, taxpayer funded rescue to follow.

The investors bought this property which was originally designed for returning vets to have low cost housing, planning to increase the rents to market rates. The courts put the kaibosh on that and since they cannot make a profit and are now underwater they are walking away.

WSJ:

A group led by Tishman Speyer Properties has decided to give up the sprawling Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town apartment complex in Manhattan to its creditors in the collapse of one of the most high-profile deals of the real-estate boom.

The decision comes after the venture between Tishman and BlackRock Inc. defaulted on the $4.4 billion debt used to help finance the deal. The venture acquired the 56-building, 11,000-unit property for $5.4 billion in 2006—the most ever paid for a single residential property in the U.S. The venture had been struggling for months to restructure the debt but capitulated facing a massive debt load and a weak New York City economy that has undercut rents and demand for high-priced apartments.

The property’s owners signaled they would be unable to reach a deal with lenders and instead decided to allow creditors to proceed with what amounts to an orderly deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, which means a borrower voluntarily gives the property back to lenders to avoid a foreclosure proceeding.

(more…)

Advertisements

January 25, 2010. Tags: , , , , , , , , , . Economy, Finance, Foreclosures, Housing, Obama Administration, Politics, Popular Culture, TARP, Taxes, Wall St. Comments off.

Obama tries to channel Hillary, proposes 3 of her campaign ideas for the middle class..

heh. Obama is latching onto 3 ideas Hillary talked about at all of her campaign rallies. Trying to ‘feel our pain’. He is no Big Dawg or Hill, and notice his cut off for middle class help is 85k a year…so much for 250k eh? Hey I will take it where we can get it but I know who we have to thank, the Tea Party Patriots, voters of Massachusetts and Hillary, who kept winning the blue collar middle class voters, primary after primary.

WSJ:

…Obama will propose Monday an expansion of the child-care tax credit and a set of other initiatives designed to help the middle class.

…a near doubling of the child and dependent care tax credit for families that make less than $85,000 a year. The tax credit rate would be boosted to 35% from 20% of qualifying expenses.

…propose limiting a student’s federal loan payments to 10% of his or her income above a basic living allowance, requiring all employers to give employees the option of enrolling in a direct-deposit IRA, expanding tax credits to match retirement savings, and improving 401(k) transparency.

Another item Hillary championed that Obama is swiping is tax credits to help families caring for an elderly relative.

Thank you Hillary.

January 25, 2010. Tags: , , , , , , . Economy, Finance, Hillary Clinton, Obama Administration, Politics, Popular Culture, Taxes, Unemployment Statistics, Wall St. Comments off.

%d bloggers like this: