SCOTUS allows Chrysler sale to Fiat: Rejects request to stop sale…
Update: CNBC
…The high court rejected a request from Indiana pension funds and other opponents of the sale to delay the deal while they challenge Chrysler’s sale to a group led by Fiat, a union-aligned trust and the U.S. and Canadian governments…
The Court did not have 4 Justices who felt the Indiana Pension funds had standing or claim to challenge the sale Phil LeBeau is reporting now..ergo the stay is lifted..Gee if only the Senior Secured Bondholders had COJONES and had filed, I am looking at you Perrella Weinberg….
…coming from Reuters via Larry Kudlow live on CNBC….
I know I play this one a lot, but it IS perfectly appropriate here….some say I always find AC/DC appropriate…well they are folks, they are…for every conceivable occasion or happening….
Courtesy of Longhorn2X
AC/DC, with the great Bon Scott, playing “Highway To Hell” live in Arnhem. 1979
You Belong to Me: The Chrysler Files: Senior non-Tarp Lenders fight back, file motion citing Radford ruling…
Video Update with extended clip of the interview with Thomas Lauria in MI this weekend courtesy of MM who has it covered in detail at her place:
Clip courtesy of PaulFVillareal2:
(5.1.09) — This audio comes courtesy of The Frank Beckmann show on WJR 760 AM Detroit. Visit WJR here:
http://www.wjr.net/And visit Beckmann’s personal page on the WJR site here:
http://www.wjr.net/Sectional.asp?id=6552
HA!!!!! HA!!!! Thank GAWD they are fighting back!!!!! Absolutely frakkin A right! The attorneys for the bondholders MUST WIN or American contract law is dead IMO and with it, the influx of capital to America that has always made us strong, would YOU lend your money to ANY American business if Team TOTUS can arbitrarily rule by FIAT going forward?, ha ha pardon the pun had to do it
Good song for this one is YOU BELONG TO ME, not to UAW or Uncle Sam to the Senior Bondholders!
Via HA, here is the pdf of the motion filed by Case & White (Thomas Lauria) on behalf of the Senior non TARP lenders of Chrysler who will FIGHT and NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THAT DARK NIGHT! A nice summary here under 17., of the easy peasy ruling this should be and the precedent:
17. Finally, that the Treasury Department would take these unconstitutional actions to help the United States address difficult economic times is not an answer. Indeed, the same justification was expressly rejected in Radford, where Justice Brandeis noted that a statute which violated secured creditors’ rights, but which was passed for sound public purposes relating to the Great Depression, could not be saved because “the Fifth Amendment commands that, however great the nation’s need, private property shall not be thus taken even for a wholly public use without just compensation.” Id. at 602.
Moderate in the Middle 